The Prophetic Aperture

A Vision of the Breach in Dhūl Qarnain’s Barrier Through Which Fasād Entered History as a Universal and Irresistible World-Order

Enter the aperture  ↓

For This Book’s Cover Design

On the front, an anonymous hand serves only as a symbolic visualisation of the finger gesture described by the Blessed Prophet Muhammad (may eternal blessings of the Almighty be upon him). Through this visual metaphor, this writer intends for the reader to interpret the gesture as a prophetic aperture, its comparative minim in physical scale concealing implications of cosmic magnitude. What appears to be a narrow breach in Dhūl Qarnain’s barrier becomes the threshold between two ages, indeed, two world orders: the opening through which Gog and Magog enter history as a universal and seemingly irresistible erumpent force of fasād. It is the reality Dr. Muhammad Iqbal discerned when he wrote:

Khul gaye Yājūj aur Mājūj ke lashkar tamām;
chashm-e-Muslim dekh le tafsīr-e-harf-e-yansilūn.

Dr Muhammad Iqbal “Unchained are all the hosts of Gog and Magog; let the Muslim eye behold the meaning of yansilūn.”

The desolate, unbounded world, on the back cover carries the reader through that aperture, transforming the prophetic gesture into a landscape of history, past, present and future: The barrier lies fallen and lifeless, its power to restrain, extinguished; across its ruins fasād has surged, trampling every boundary until corruption possesses not only the structures of civilisation, possessing its engines, and entering the innermost sanctuary of the human soul.

For those who make the time to rehash the modern world, will observe that we usually divide the crises of modern civilisation into distinct domains, something this writer can only describe as ‘epistemic atomisation’. Political oppression is studied apart from economic injustice; moral decline apart from technological power; the destruction of the family unit apart from the corruption of food, water and the natural world. Each is treated as fragmented from the whole, requiring its own domain-specific approach. The Qur’ānic concept of fasād, however, summons the reader to recover a unified and holistic vision, one accessible only to those willing to exercise the God-given faculty of reflective thought. It describes corruption that spreads through the whole order of life until what is destructive becomes normal, what is unjust becomes lawful, and what is morally disordered presents itself as progress. At that stage, corruption is no longer merely the conduct of particular individuals or governments. It has become systemic: embedded in institutions, habits, markets, sciences, cultures, technologies and accepted ways of thinking.

This book asks whether Gog and Magog should be understood within precisely such a framework.

Are they mysterious peoples who remain physically confined behind an ancient barrier, awaiting release at some future moment? Or are they human communities whose presence must be recognised through their impact upon history characterised by the expansion of overwhelming power, the spread of universal fasād, and the emergence of a world-order capable of penetrating nearly every dimension of human existence?

The author, may the Almighty preserve and strengthen his efforts, argues that Gog and Magog have already been released. Their distinguishing mark is not physical appearance, ethnicity or geography, but the historical consequences of their power. They are identified through a civilisation that extends its hegemony across the Earth, commands the heights, dissolves inherited boundaries and reorganises the world according to a godless conception of order, or put another way, an invisible matrix of power through which modern civilization moves.

Such an order progressively reduces the human being to worker, voter, user, consumer and statistic—and, in its latest and perhaps most totalising iteration, to data. It proclaims freedom even as it silently fixes the perimeter of the invisible prison within which choice is permitted. It persuades people to participate willingly in their own surveillance, exhaustion and estrangement, until obedience is experienced as independence. How bewildering!

The power exercised through Gog and Magog’s world-order is not a constant. It advances in phases, as successive waves, changing modalities or lengthening shadows. It can be argued that the force described earlier as having been unleashed with implications of cosmic magnitude becomes historically intelligible through three dominant modalities. First, sovereign power rules from above through law, punishment, armies and the visible threat of death. Second, biopolitical power administers life itself by classifying, disciplining, measuring and regulating bodies and populations. Third, psychopolitical power penetrates the interior life of the subject, shaping attention, desire, emotion and choice until external command is transformed into voluntary self-regulation. Power thus passes from commanding the body, to administering life, and finally to colonising the psyche, an apt description of colonial isomorphism if there ever was one. Yet this is not a succession by erasure: each new modality absorbs, refines and conceals the preceding one, until the sovereign’s sword, the administrator’s ledger and the invisible government of the soul operate together.

The language of this global charade plays a decisive role in this largely technology-enabled process. Oppression can be renamed security; exploitation, development; censorship, protection; and the killing of innocent people, collateral damage. Once language ceases to reveal reality, the conscience loses its ability to judge it. Falsehood does not always prevail by silencing truth. It may prevail by surrounding truth with so many manufactured descriptions that reality itself becomes difficult to recognise.

This is why the question of Gog and Magog cannot be reduced to locating an extraordinary people behind some obscure ruin. The deeper problem is the systemic nature of fasād: power becomes universal while responsibility disappears. Each actor fulfils a limited function, each institution follows procedure, yet the aggregate produces oppression beyond any individual’s capacity.

The cover’s void therefore signifies more than an “event of events.” It represents epistemic encapsulation, the corruption and loss of the very faculties required to perceive corruption as a system rather than a people. The part severed from the whole, and repetition substituted for thought; deduction from revelation and prophecy, and induction from history both atrophy.

Could the fixation of much contemporary Islamic scholarship upon the release or restraint of physical multitudes, while overlooking their civilisational system, be an effect of that system itself? To mistake bodies for apparatus, event for structure and ruins for reality is a form of ‘system-blindness’. A world-order achieves its consummate dominion when it controls not only its subjects, but the conceptual grammar through which even its critics attempt to comprehend it.

Against this corrupted use of power, the Qur’ānic account of Dhūl Qarnain presents a radically different order. His authority rests upon faith in the Lord-God and is exercised to restrain the oppressor, protect the vulnerable and reward righteous conduct. The barrier he constructs against Gog and Magog is therefore more than a feat of engineering. It represents power placed under moral command and used as an instrument of Divine mercy.

The book’s interpretation of Dhūl Qarnain as the possessor of two qarns—two ages or historical epochs—transforms the narrative into a philosophy of history. The Qur’ān describes the first occasion on which Gog and Magog were restrained. The second belongs to the approaching culmination of history, when their global power will again be blocked and the existing world-order will begin to collapse.

Jerusalem occupies the centre of this interpretation. The return of the Jews to the Holy Land, the rise of modern Western civilisation, the universal spread of fasād, the coming Great War and the return of the true Messiah are presented not as isolated events, but as interconnected movements within a single eschatological thread.

Readers need not accept every conclusion without question. Indeed, the book calls for careful examination, serious disagreement and responsible scholarly response. But it insists that inherited explanations must answer to revelation and reality.

What if Gog and Magog appear mysterious not because they are absent from the modern world, but because the modern world has become unable to recognise itself in their description?